Adidas Metalbone 2026 Review vs Bullpadel Hack 04 2026 Review
This comparison uses the padel.how review library: measured or reviewed specs, total score, and the detailed scorecard from each racket review.
Quick verdict
Adidas Metalbone 2026 Review has the higher padel.how score, but the better choice still depends on whether its shape, balance, and comfort profile fit your game.
| Racket | Adidas Metalbone 2026 Review | Bullpadel Hack 04 2026 Review |
|---|---|---|
| Total score | 74/100 | 73/100 |
| Shape | Diamond | Diamond (classic attack mold with high sweet spot positioning) |
| Weight | 360–375 g | Typically 370–380 g with overgrip and standard weight configuration |
| Balance | High (head-heavy) | High (approximately 270–272 mm from handle base, head-heavy configuration) |
| Face | Carbon 18K | TriCarbon 18K (three-directional carbon fiber weave, 18,000 filament count) |
| Core | Soft EVA | MultiEVA (multi-density EVA foam with graduated firmness layers) |
| Surface | — | Light linear texture (non-sandpaper finish, oriented vertical lines) |
Score breakdown
| Category | Adidas Metalbone 2026 Review | Bullpadel Hack 04 2026 Review |
|---|---|---|
| Maneuverability and handling | 6.0 | 7.0 |
| Net performance under pace | 7.0 | 7.5 |
| Control and placement precision | 7.0 | 8.0 |
| Defensive output and depth access | 5.0 | 6.5 |
| Off-center stability and torsional resistance | 7.0 | 7.5 |
| Sweet spot usability | 6.0 | 6.5 |
| Spin generation potential | 7.0 | 7.5 |
| Power ceiling | 9.0 | 8.5 |
| Power accessibility | 5.0 | 6.5 |
| Comfort and impact feedback | 5.0 | 7.0 |
Which one should you choose?
Choose by fit before score. If you need easier defense, look at handling, sweet spot, comfort, and defensive output. If you want a more attacking racket, focus on power ceiling, power accessibility, net performance, and stability.